SAMPLE REPORT
RH Factor Consulting Group
Human Capital Intelligence Platform
BASIC REPORT β€” SAMPLE
RH Factor Human Capital Intelligence Platform™
Executive Intelligence Suite  |  RHF-EAB
RH Executive Aptitude Battery
Measuring the core cognitive capabilities that predict senior executive performance
Candidate
Nandita Krishnaswamy
Organisation
Ascent Group
Role
Executive Director β€” Operations
Date
13 June 2026
Prepared by RH Factor Consulting Group  |  rhfactor.in
SAMPLE β€” CONFIDENTIAL

Overall Capability Index

Composite score across all 6 dimensions β€” 0 to 100 scale
62 Developing
Strength: 72–100
Developing: 50–71
Watch Zone: Below 50
Nandita's overall profile sits in the Developing band with an index of 62/100. The profile shows a mix of developing capabilities with specific targeted investment required in the dimensions below. This is a sample report β€” the actual report is generated live from the candidate's real responses and reflects their specific profile.

Dimension Profile

Capability scores across all 6 measured dimensions
Competency Radar
Numerical…Verbal Re…Abstract …Critical …Decision …Strategic…
Numerical Reasoning
Developing 60
Interpreting and applying quantitative data
Verbal Reasoning
Developing 70
Understanding and evaluating written arguments
Abstract Reasoning
Developing 65
Identifying patterns and logical sequences
Critical Thinking
Developing 70
Evaluating evidence and arguments logically
Decision Quality
Developing 55
Sound judgement under realistic constraints
Strategic Synthesis
Developing 50
Integrating diverse information into coherent direction

Dimension Interpretations

Score-band interpretation and development points for each dimension.
Numerical Reasoning 60/100 β€” Developing
A Developing score in this dimension reflects a transition phase. The foundation is there; the consistency and depth are not yet fully established. This is a workable gap and the most common developmental profile at this career stage. Specific, structured investment β€” not broad professional development β€” is the most efficient path.
  • Build one specific new habit in this dimension over the next 90 days. Small, consistent, and deliberate β€” not an episodic programme.
  • Seek direct feedback from a trusted colleague on what this capability looks like from the outside. Their observation is more accurate than your self-assessment.
Verbal Reasoning 70/100 β€” Developing
This dimension is present and functional but has not yet reached the level of consistent, reliable strength. There are contexts β€” typically those with higher stakes, greater ambiguity, or extended duration β€” where the capability is less reliably available. Targeted development would close this gap meaningfully within 6–12 months.
  • Build one specific new habit in this dimension over the next 90 days. Small, consistent, and deliberate β€” not an episodic programme.
  • Seek direct feedback from a trusted colleague on what this capability looks like from the outside. Their observation is more accurate than your self-assessment.
Abstract Reasoning 65/100 β€” Developing
This dimension is present and functional but has not yet reached the level of consistent, reliable strength. There are contexts β€” typically those with higher stakes, greater ambiguity, or extended duration β€” where the capability is less reliably available. Targeted development would close this gap meaningfully within 6–12 months.
  • Build one specific new habit in this dimension over the next 90 days. Small, consistent, and deliberate β€” not an episodic programme.
  • Seek direct feedback from a trusted colleague on what this capability looks like from the outside. Their observation is more accurate than your self-assessment.
Critical Thinking 70/100 β€” Developing
A Developing score in this dimension reflects a transition phase. The foundation is there; the consistency and depth are not yet fully established. This is a workable gap and the most common developmental profile at this career stage. Specific, structured investment β€” not broad professional development β€” is the most efficient path.
  • Build one specific new habit in this dimension over the next 90 days. Small, consistent, and deliberate β€” not an episodic programme.
  • Seek direct feedback from a trusted colleague on what this capability looks like from the outside. Their observation is more accurate than your self-assessment.
Decision Quality 55/100 β€” Developing
A Developing score in this dimension reflects a transition phase. The foundation is there; the consistency and depth are not yet fully established. This is a workable gap and the most common developmental profile at this career stage. Specific, structured investment β€” not broad professional development β€” is the most efficient path.
  • Build one specific new habit in this dimension over the next 90 days. Small, consistent, and deliberate β€” not an episodic programme.
  • Seek direct feedback from a trusted colleague on what this capability looks like from the outside. Their observation is more accurate than your self-assessment.
Strategic Synthesis 50/100 β€” Developing
This dimension is present and functional but has not yet reached the level of consistent, reliable strength. There are contexts β€” typically those with higher stakes, greater ambiguity, or extended duration β€” where the capability is less reliably available. Targeted development would close this gap meaningfully within 6–12 months.
  • Build one specific new habit in this dimension over the next 90 days. Small, consistent, and deliberate β€” not an episodic programme.
  • Seek direct feedback from a trusted colleague on what this capability looks like from the outside. Their observation is more accurate than your self-assessment.

Development Priority Map

Dimensions categorised by immediate development priority

Leverage Now

None

Build Further

Numerical Reasoning
Verbal Reasoning
Abstract Reasoning
Critical Thinking
Decision Quality
Strategic Synthesis

Priority Focus

None

Ready to Commission?

This sample shows the structure of the Basic Report every candidate receives immediately on completion. The Advanced Practitioner Report β€” delivered within 3 working days β€” goes significantly deeper with full narrative, context-specific interpretation, and debrief.

RHF-EAB  |  RH Executive Aptitude Battery
© 2026 RH Factor Consulting Group. All rights reserved.
Capt. Rahul Sharma (Retd.) · Psychometrician
rhfactor.in  |  +91 9820157383